美國球迷熱議NBA30支球隊相當於五大聯賽哪支足球俱樂部

美國JRS之聲

美國球迷熱議NBA30支球隊相當於五大聯賽哪支足球俱樂部

Soccer equivalents of NBA franchises (self.nba)

足球俱樂部對應的NBA球隊。

I thought this would be an interesting exercise, try to see which soccer club would be the equivalent of the NBA franchises. I couldn"t figure it out for a lot of them though, since I only started following the NBA recently, but I"ll do my best here. Also, feel free to correct and/or suggest clubs for the franchises I missed. (Apologies in advance for the people who don"t follow European soccer).

我覺得這會是一個好玩的事情，就是看看足球俱樂部對應的NBA球隊是哪些。我不太能說出太多這樣的等價關係，因為我最近才開始關注NBA，但是我會盡全力去做。另外，大家可以糾正或者建議一些與NBA球隊對應的足球俱樂部，如果我有哪裡遺漏了的話。（對於那些不關心歐洲足壇的人，首先表示抱歉）。

Atlanta Hawks: Tottenham Hotspur. Both teams always perform well. Sometimes have superb seasons, have been home to superstars. Just can"t seem to take the next step, and blew their best chance in years to make an impact recently.

亞特蘭大老鷹：托特納姆熱刺足球俱樂部

兩支球隊總是表現的很出色，有時候會打出非常亮眼的賽季，也有過很多超級球星，但是就是不能有進一步的突破，在最近幾年都有機會創造屬於自己的傳奇。

Boston Celtics: Liverpool. It"s been a while since they were the dominant team in the league. Had a brief period of relevancy a few years ago, but are back to the middle of the pack now. Definitely on the up though, with a highly-rated coach.

波士頓凱爾特人：利物浦。距離他們上一次稱霸聯盟都已經過去很久了。在過去的一段時間中也曾短暫的重回巔峰，但是目前又回到了中流球隊的水平。總之肯定處於上升期，都擁有一位非常棒的教練。

Brooklyn Nets: Fulham. Team is doing decently, even overachieving a couple of seasons. Then the management for some reason make terrible decisions with regards to coaching/players and the team nosepes. Both stuck in mediocrity as of now.

布魯克林籃網：富勒姆足球俱樂部。兩支球隊都有過輝煌的時期，在好幾個賽季的成績都超出的預期，之後管理層對於教練和球員的人事安排做出了錯誤的決定，然後球隊便走遠了。現在都無法擺脫平庸。

Charlotte Hornets:

夏洛特黃蜂：暫無對應球隊。

Chicago Bulls: Napoli. Had the GOAT play for them, and won titles with him, but then didn"t touch those heights once he left. Rose back again with a superstar, but then let him go (for differing reasons, of course).

芝加哥公牛：那不勒斯足球俱樂部。曾經擁有歷史上最偉大的球員為他們效力，並在他的帶領下拿到了很多冠軍，然而當他離開後便再也沒有達到那樣的高度。之後在新的超級球星加盟後再度崛起，可卻沒有選擇留下他（當然是因為不同的原因）。

Cleveland Cavaliers: Paris Saint-Germain. Were completely irrelevant until a superstar decided to come to that team and the ownership surrounded him with talent. Now are the runaway favourites in their league/conference.

克利夫蘭騎士：巴黎聖日耳曼足球俱樂部。本來是毫無競爭力的球隊，直到一名超級球星選擇了加入他們，然而管理者圍繞著他搭配了不同的天賦，現在都是各自聯賽里的領頭羊。

Dallas Mavericks: AS Roma. Have a beloved one-club superstar on their team, but now that he"s old, can"t seem to find a consistent identity, falling short of expectations every season in recent times.

達拉斯小牛：羅馬俱樂部。有一名俱樂部的元老球員，也是超級球星，但是現在他老了，卻並不能找到他的接班人，最近的每一個賽季都打得不盡人意。

Denver Nuggets: West Bromwich Albion. Off the radar of everyone. Probably the team that is least talked about, good or bad.

丹佛掘金：西布羅姆維奇足球俱樂部。他們在每個人的討論範圍之外，也許是關注度最低的球隊，不管是好是壞。

Detroit Pistons: Stoke City. Accused of playing a dirty/physical game (not without reason). Now considered a good team with a better style of play. Still not good enough to contend though, looking in from just outside the periphery.

底特律活塞：斯托克城足球俱樂部。兩者都因為其強硬/骯髒的打法（並不是沒有原因的）而被人指責。現在換了另一種稍微好一點的打法，也被認為是一支強隊，只不過沒有好到能夠競爭總冠軍，只是處在外圍的球隊。

Golden State Warriors: Manchester City. Were really crap for the longest while, but the loyal fans stuck through thick and thin. Became the powerhouses of the league seemingly overnight, and favourites for the title.

金州勇士：曼城隊。在很長一段時間內都是魚腩，但是他們的球迷始終不離不棄。在最近幾年，好像一夜之間就成為了聯盟里的超級球隊，並成為總冠軍最有力的競爭者。

Houston Rockets:

休斯頓火箭：暫無對應球隊。

Indiana Pacers: Bayer Leverkusen. Both consistently good teams. Sometimes good enough to challenge at the top, but falling short in those seasons.

印第安納步行者：勒沃庫森足球俱樂部。一直以來都是強隊，有時候強到能去挑戰頂級強隊，但是在最近幾個賽季衰落了。

Los Angeles Clippers: Arsenal. Even if they are having a great season, you just know at the back of your mind that they are going to fuck it up somewhere down the line.

洛杉磯快船：阿森納俱樂部。就算他們正在打出一個出色的賽季，在你的潛意識裡，你還是認為他們在某個時間點裡會陰溝翻船。

Los Angeles Lakers: Manchester United. Had an extended period of dominance under arguably the best coach of all time. Now back in a rebuilding phase. The general consensus is that even with their struggles, they"ll be back at or near the top soon.

洛杉磯湖人：曼聯足球俱樂部。在歷史上最佳教練的執教下擁有過很長一段時間的統治期。現在則進入了重建時期，但是輿論仍然認為雖然他們現在打得很掙扎，然而過不了不多就會重回巔峰。

Memphis Grizzlies:

孟菲斯灰熊：暫無對應球隊。

Miami Heat: Inter Milan. Had a couple of seasons where they were the villain and won everything in sight. Once that team broke up, went down from those heights, and right now are in a rebuilding phase.

邁阿密熱火：國際米蘭足球俱樂部。有過幾個賽季，他們被所有人認為是反派，也贏得了能夠贏得所有獎盃，但是一旦球隊分崩離析，便跌落神壇，現在正在重建當中。

Milwaukee Bucks: Torino. Have a squad of young players and a good coach. Still not competitive though, and have a potentially transcendental player in their squad.

密爾沃基雄鹿隊：都靈足球俱樂部。擁有一群年輕的球員和一位出色的教練，但是仍然競爭力不足，而且有一位極具潛力的超新星在陣中。

Minnesota Timberwolves: Borussia Dortmund. there can"t be an exact comparison with the Wolves, because every soccer team with potential superstar young players are teams contending right now. Therefore, I think that Dortmund under Jurgen Kopp at the beginning of his tenure at the club is the best match. Both up and coming teams with lots of young talent who upset the status quo within a few years.

明尼蘇達森林狼：多特蒙德。這個對比不太恰當，因為現在基本上每個擁有很多有潛力年輕球員的足球俱樂部都屬於爭冠的球隊。所以說，我認為尤爾根-科普剛剛在多特蒙德開啟自己的任期讓這個對比顯得最有道理。兩支球隊都屬於重建期，都擁有很多年輕的天賦，在未來的幾年裡將會徹底改變目前的境地。

New Orleans Pelicans: West Ham United. Have a genuine world-class player, but the players around him got injured and made the team look worse than it actually is. Even with everyone fit though, still not a top-tier team though.

新奧爾良鵜鶘：西漢姆聯足球俱樂部。擁有一名世界頂級的運動員，但是他周圍的隊友們卻都受傷了，讓這支球隊看上去比真實情況要糟糕很多，就算每個人都健康回來後，仍然不是一支頂級的球隊。

New York Knicks: England National Team. Every year begins with a renewed sense of hope that this is the season that the team will be good. After another underwhelming start for the umpteenth time, the fans resort to what they do best - start making self-deprecating jokes over how the team exists solely to shatter their expectations and that they were stupid to believe in it anyway. Bonus points for the existence of a boy wonder in both teams who is expected to lead them to the promised land.

紐約尼克斯：英格蘭國家隊。每年在賽季開始時兩支球隊都好像看到了復興的希望，但是再經歷了一個又一個不如人意的開端後，球迷們便開始自嘲——相信這支球隊真是最愚蠢的選擇。不過好的一面是，兩支球隊都有一名出色的年輕人，承載著復興球隊的希望。

Oklahoma City Thunder:

俄克拉荷馬雷霆：暫無對應球隊。

Orlando Magic:

奧蘭多魔術：暫無對應球隊。

Philadelphia 76ers: Southampton. Spent a while in purgatory hell. Now have a couple of pieces to make them relevant again, and maybe considered a challenger few years down the line, if the young players pan out.

費城76人：南安普頓足球俱樂部。都經歷過一段非常黑暗的重建期，現在擁有了好幾塊能讓他們重新崛起的拼圖，也許幾年之後會被認為是冠軍挑戰者，如果這些年輕人都能打出來的話。

Phoenix Suns:

菲尼克斯太陽：暫無對應球隊。

Portland Trail Blazers: Everton. Never quite seem to make the jump to the next tier, despite the squad being believed to be good enough to do so. People downplay their good seasons as overachieving, and their not-so-good seasons as par for the course.

波特蘭開拓者：埃弗頓足球俱樂部。從來沒有真正完成過一次突破，儘管擁有足夠好的球員。當他們打出一個出色的賽季時，人們總認為這是超水平的表現；而當他們經歷了一個不太好的賽季時，人們會認為理所當然。

Sacramento Kings: Sunderland. Haven"t been competitive for a long time, with the future outlook not too bright either. (At least Kings have a superstar with which to have a chance though. Sunderland don"t even have that going for them.)

薩克拉門托國王：桑德蘭足球俱樂部。已經失去競爭力很久了，未來也不那麼光明。（最起碼國王還擁有一名超級球星，讓未來看上去還有一絲絲機會，而桑德蘭什麼都沒有）。

San Antonio Spurs: Bayern Munich. The organization is put forward as a model of consistency. Credited with always competing in spite of roster/coaching (in the case of Bayern) turnover. Manchester United under Sir Alex Ferguson is the closest comparison to the current Spurs organization. 20 years of consistency along with multiple one-club legends.

聖安東尼奧馬刺：拜仁慕尼黑。他們倆都是持久性的典型，就算球員/教練（拜仁慕尼黑的情況）出了一些差錯，他們仍然能保持競爭力，也因為這一點他們受到了極大的讚賞。弗格森手下的那支曼聯是和目前馬刺最類似的球隊。都保持了20年以上的競爭力，並培養出了很多俱樂部傳奇球星。

Toronto Raptors: Atletico Madrid. Have the reputation of a scrappy team, giving every team a fight and never giving up. Have a couple of star players of their own. Almost always seem to fall short at the last hurdle against the best team(s) in their league.

多倫多猛龍：馬德里競技。擁有強隊的美譽，不管遇到哪支球隊都全力以赴，從不放棄。也擁有自己培養出來的一些球星，但是總是在最後與聯盟頂級強隊的較量中落敗。

Utah Jazz: Villareal. Both have had a couple of generational talents in their team. Have had periods of close shaves of winning the title, and periods of irrelevance. Both are teams that are today considered to be really good and in the next tier after the best teams.

猶他爵士：維拉利爾足球俱樂部。兩者都曾經擁有過跨時代的巨星，並在一段時間內非常有機會拿到冠軍，也曾在一段時間內完全淪為魚腩。不過現在兩支球隊都被認為是強隊，並屬於緊挨著第一梯隊的那些球隊。

Washington Wizards:

華盛頓奇才：暫無對應球隊。

PS: I realize that it"s hard to come up with a one-to-one equivalent, mostly because of the different ways the leagues are set up, but this is what I could come up with.、

PS：我發現要把聯盟所有球隊和足球俱樂部一一對應起來很來，主要原因是NBA和足球聯賽的組成方式不太一樣，但是以上就是我能想到的所有了。

[–]Magicrsdio 162 指標 1 天前

Atlanta: Atalanta. Very similar names. Probably other stuff too.

亞特蘭大老鷹：亞特蘭大足球俱樂部。幾乎一樣的名字，也許其他的方面也很相似。

[–][SAS] Boban MarjanovicSean88888 5 指標 1 天前

I believe they"re both named after Atalanta, which is a Greek goddess or something

我相信他們都是以亞特蘭大這個人命名的，他是個古希臘的神，或者是類似的人物。

[–]KnicksFromLatviaWithLove 67 指標 1 天前

England is such a perfect comparison for the Knicks that I think we need to include international comparisons (coming from a English Knicks fan)

英格蘭國家隊能夠完美的對應尼克斯，我覺得你這個名單應該包含國家隊才好（來自一個尼克斯加英格蘭的球迷）。

[–]parag14[S] 10 指標 1 天前

Whoa that is absolutely perfect, I didn"t even think of that. I"ll edit it once I get back home.

喔，這個想法非常棒，我甚至都沒有想到這些，回家後我會立馬列出我心目中的對應關係。

[–]SpursCokeSniffa 40 指標 1 天前

Clippers - even if they are having a great season, you know at the back of your mind they are gonna fuck up somewhere.

洛杉磯快船——就算他們正在打出一個出色的賽季，在你的潛意識裡，你還是認為他們在某個時間點裡會陰溝翻船。

[–]San Diego Clipperschigginz27 6 指標 22小時前

Clippers as Arsenal is a great comparison.

快船與阿森納是個非常棒的對應。

[–]extrakrispy 72 指標 1 天前

The Cavs = Real Madrid comparison is a little bit of a stretch. Real is the most storied club in world soccer and the Cavs have just recently won their first ever title. They also splash like crazy on superstars. The Celtics, even if they arent very good, would probably be a better comparison.

騎士=皇家馬德里顯得有些牽強，皇家馬德里是足球中歷史最悠久，榮譽最多的俱樂部之一，而騎士才剛剛拿下了隊史上第一座總冠軍。而且在超級球星加盟數上，他們倆也差的很遠。凱爾特人，就算他們現在不是很強，相對於皇家馬德里來說，也會是個更好的對應。

[–]Mavericksmvnvel 20 指標 1 天前

the Lakers are more Real than anyone tbh

事實上，湖人比任何一支其他球隊都能更合適的去對應皇家馬德里。

[–][BOS] Isaiah Thomaspapi617 6 指標 17小時前

What a coincidence! I just happen to hate both teams

哈哈哈，多麼棒的一個巧合，這兩支球隊我都憎恨。

[–]parag14[S] 8 指標 1 天前

I would agree that it"s a bit of a stretch. The reason I didn"t compare them with the Celtics is that they are not contenders right now, while the Cavs and Madrid are. Also, I saw the similarities between LeBron and Ronaldo, and ran with it.

我卻覺得這個對應有點牽強，我不會把凱爾特人作為皇家馬德里的對應球隊的原因是，凱爾特人現在已經不屬於爭冠球隊了，然而騎士卻屬於。另外，勒布朗和C羅有著非常多的相似點，所以我選擇騎士。

Also, the best comparison to Real would be a franchise who has historically and currently always been a contender in the NBA, and there"s no one franchise that fits it right now.

不過最適合去對比皇家馬德里的NBA球隊應該是在歷史上一直保持奪冠實力的一支球隊，而目前沒有哪一隻NBA球隊能夠一直做到這點。

[–][LAC] Chris PaulOptism 19 指標 1 天前

Popovich is Sir Alex Ferguson

波波維奇就是籃球界的弗格森。

[–]WarriorsButtMuddBrookss 33 指標 1 天前

Real Madrid is either the celtics or lakers

皇家馬德里應該對應湖人或者凱爾特人。

[–]gana04 3 指標 1 天前

Except Real is at the top right now, neither Celtics or Lakers can say that. I like his choices, MU and Liverpool were legit top of the premier league for quite a while and now are rebuilding.

只不過皇家馬德里現在仍然是爭冠球隊，而凱爾特人和湖人都不是了。我喜歡樓主的選擇，曼聯和利物浦之前都統治過聯賽一段時間，而現在他們都在重建。

[–][LAC] Cole AldrichGelatoCube 3 指標 1 天前

Real would be the Lakers if there wasn"t a salary cap, simply put. Free agents would flock cause they have the most money and name recognition, and they would have a once in a generation talent who played for a popular team and jumped ship, so wilt from Philly and ronaldo to real. Keep in mind I don"t follow soccer, so please feel free to correct me

如果NBA沒有工資帽，那麼皇家馬德里最好的對應無疑是湖人。自由球員會像潮水一樣湧向湖人，因為湖人有著最多的錢和最大的名氣。而且歷史上都有過曾經為一支很受歡迎球隊效力的傳奇巨星轉而加盟了湖人/皇家馬德里，就像張伯倫從76人轉會以及大羅轉會到皇馬一樣。不過我其實不關注足球，所以如果哪裡說錯了請糾正我。

[–]Yeezyjuice 12 指標 1 天前

The cavs are not real Madrid they have no past history or anything similar to Madrid other than they have a great player. The Celtics are the perfect equivalent to real Madrid, I think the cavs equivalent is Leicester city they won the premier league defying the odds first time winning it too just like the cavs.

騎士可不是NBA的皇馬，除了都擁有一位非常出色的球員外，它根本沒有類似皇馬輝煌的歷史。凱爾特人才是皇馬完美的對應，我覺得和騎士最類似的足球俱樂部應該是萊切斯特城，他們也在大家都不看好的情況下贏得了第一座聯賽冠軍，這一點很像騎士。

[–]Thunder Bandwagonvfene 5 指標 1 天前

but we knew the Cavs were one of the best teams, with some of the best players, we just didn"t think they could beat the Warriors, whereas LCFC in the Premier League were expected to be relegated

但是大家都知道騎士是NBA最強的球隊之一，我們只是認為他們不可能擊敗勇士罷了，而萊切斯特城在一開始的時候則被認為是一支處於保級邊緣的球隊。

[–]johncenatbh 32 指標 1 天前

Spurs under Pop = United under Ferguson

Had one coach/manager for 20+ years

Had players playing for them their entire careers, model of consistency, United never finished below 3rd and Spurs havnet missed the playoffs, every year contenders despite people saying they will drop off.

Duncan, Ginobili, Parker = Giggs, Scholes, Neville

波波維奇手下的馬刺=弗格森手下的曼聯。

在超過20年的時間裡擁有同一位教練/總經理。

擁有為其奉獻全部職業生涯的球員，是保持競爭力的典型例子，曼聯從來沒有低於過聯賽第3，馬刺從來沒有掉出季後賽，每年他們都能夠去最終競爭總冠軍，儘管大家都認為他們會衰落。

鄧肯，吉諾比利，帕克=吉格斯，斯科爾斯，內維爾。

[–]parag14[S] 8 指標 1 天前

That was the perfect example, IMO. I didn"t put it because that was a while ago, and United are not the same anymore. I wanted to compare current states of the franchises. I guess I can still put it up as an edit.

在我看來，馬刺對應曼聯是一個完美的對應。我沒有寫出來是因為曼聯已經不是過去那支曼聯了。我想要找出目前這支曼聯所能對應的NBA球隊，不過我覺得這還是可以作為參考的。

[–][GSW] Jason RichardsonTheCleanRhino 18 指標 1 天前

It would have been more true last year but the 76ers would be an MLS team lol

我覺得去年這個比喻更恰當，但是76人更像是一支美國職業足球大聯盟的球隊，哈哈哈。

[–]Magicrsdio 6 指標 1 天前

It"s still true. MLS is the only league with draft picks to tank for.

現在也仍然是對的，美國職業足球大聯盟是唯一一個肯定能夠通過擺爛而取得選秀順位的聯盟。

[–][GSW] Draymond Greenleechinann 9 指標 1 天前

Sacramento Kings is pretty similar to Sunderland in the sense that they are both run by absolutely absurd management and they almost never seem to find a sense of continuity with theiir head coaches and managers

國王確實和桑德蘭足球俱樂部有點像，他們的管理層都非常糟糕，而且似乎從來都沒有找到能夠持續下去的主教練和總經理。

[–]Maverickshlolli_banani 7 指標 1 天前

Maybe Cavs should be PSG? PSG didn"t win the league for a 20 year period until a couple of years ago, and now they"ve been dominating it the last couple years. And even though Ibrahimovich isn"t playing for them anymore, I can see some parallels between him and Lebron.

也許騎士才應該是NBA的巴黎聖日耳曼？巴黎聖日耳曼在過去20多年間都沒有贏下一座聯賽冠軍，直到幾年前才取得突破，之後他們便一直延續了統治的趨勢。儘管伊布拉希莫維奇現在不再為巴黎聖日耳曼效力了，我仍然能看到他和勒布朗之間的相似點。

[–]Maverickshlolli_banani 5 指標 1 天前

Nets could be Fulham. Team is doing alright then new owner comes in and wrecks everything. Both teams have had better days.

籃網和富勒姆足球俱樂部很像。他們本來都打得非常出色，直到新的老闆降臨，然後搞砸了一切，兩支球隊都有過輝煌的過去。

[–]LakersBraveFencerMusashi 3 指標 1 天前

What about Chelsea?

那麼切爾西呢？

[–]Lakersdreezyyyy 2 指標 1 天前

Chelsea should be the Warriors. Came off a league championship in 2014-2015 and then couldn"t repeat what they did the next. Also Chelsea fanbase is recognized as one of the top 5 teams with the most bandwagon fans hahaha

切爾西應該是足壇中的金州勇士。在2014-15賽季取得聯賽冠軍後，他們沒能在下一年中衛冕。同時切爾西的球迷數量也被認為是俱樂部中前五的，並擁有最多的贏球蜜，哈哈哈。

[–]parag14[S] 2 指標 1 天前

Yeah that"s the closest comparison with respect to Chelsea. But I think that City is a better comparison to the Warriors than Chelsea. I mean Chelsea were in relegation form halfway through 15-16 lol. Safe to say Warriors were the complete opposite.

是的，勇士是與切爾西最相似的NBA球隊了。但是我還是覺得那個什麼城更適合勇士，因為直到15-16賽季過了一半後，切爾西都是一盤散沙。而顯然勇士則完全相反。

[–]Bullsscottishere 2 指標 1 天前

Chelsea is definitely GSW, because fuck Chelsea!

切爾西顯然就是足壇的金州勇士，因為「去他娘的切爾西」。

Draymond = Costa

追夢格林=科斯塔。

註：2015年1月30日，英足總在官方網站上宣布因為在聯賽杯半決賽次回合踩踏利物浦中衛埃姆雷-詹，科斯塔將被禁賽3場國內賽事，處罰即刻生效，也就意味著，科斯塔無緣周末大戰曼城，以及接下來與維拉、埃弗頓的英超聯賽。

[–][LAC] Lamar OdomUmbricon 3 指標 1 天前

I would actually say the Spurs" closest comp would be Barcelona. Ignoring Pop for a second, both are clubs that have had extended dynasties with really no sign of slowing down due to playing an iconic, revolutionary style.

我其實覺得巴塞羅那最應該對應的是馬刺。先忽略波波維奇一會兒，因為他們標誌性的，革新性的打法，兩個俱樂部的統治力都一直延續了很長的時間，而且根本沒有衰落的跡象。

[–]Lakersliverpool_lakers 3 指標 1 天前*

My two favorite teams are the equivalent to my two most hated teams. I want to throw up

兩支我最喜歡的球隊對應的球隊卻是我最討厭的，我不想看了。

我們的公眾號：ChinaReddit，還處於成長之中~，微博：虎撲美國JRS之聲~

希望得到您更多的改善建議和支持！