如何改革選秀制度拯救小市場球隊,像足球一樣搞青訓體系?
GIF/1K
如何改革選秀制度拯救小市場球隊,像足球一樣搞青訓體系?
SVG Says He Would Eliminate the Draft and Have Rookies Sign as Free Agents
斯坦-范甘迪表示,(如果是他的話)他會取消選秀,並讓新秀以自由球員的身份簽約。
[–][MIL] Giannis AntETOkounmpoWIN011 2069 指標 15小時前
Let s actually execute every small market team. Why give em a chance anyway.
雄鹿球迷:我們乾脆把小球市球隊都送上絞刑架得了。還給他們機會幹嘛,啊。
[–]Cavaliersbenelchuncho 335 指標 15小時前
Use youth academies like in football
可以像足球那樣搞青訓營啊。
[–]SupersonicsGLORYBETOGODPIMP 191 指標 13小時前
This is the real answer for basketball and American football. Cut the NCAA out and develop your own talent. Baseball has a system somewhat for this already with the farm league and drafting players out of HS.
這對籃球和橄欖球而言是條真正的出路。取消NCAA,培養各自學校自己的人才。棒球已經有一套像樣的體系了,建立後備聯賽並從高中選拔球員。
[–]wallie71 83 指標 13小時前
Yea and with the recent Nike and Adidas news, already somewhat here
是啊沒錯,加上最近耐克與阿迪達斯的那些醜聞,你這個回答還真靠點邊呢。
[–]alsofuckswithducks 47 指標 12小時前
The average age of an mlb rookie is like 25 though. A similar system would be hard in the nba and they would just rush players through after a year or two and they wouldn t really be any better off than if they had just played that year or two in college.
一名MLB新秀的平均年齡差不多是25歲。而在NBA推行這種類似的體系會有些難度,球隊會在一兩年後就倉促地讓球員參加正式比賽,球員不會比在大學只打個一兩年這種情況要好多少。
[–]Cavaliersbenelchuncho 21 指標 12小時前
In football players debut even younger than in NBA, around 17-19 years old
在足球界,球員首秀可比NBA球員的要早啊,差不多17到19歲的時候吧。
[–]Warriorsabothanspy 82 指標 12小時前
It works just fine for the biggest sport in the world though.
這套法子只對這個世界上最大的體育運動奏效罷了。
[–]CavaliersSephirothstein 62 指標 11小時前
that s because you can play soccer against grown men if you re a big 16 year old. you won t find any high school baseball or basketball player who can do the same outside of lebron
那是因為如果你16歲時個頭什麼的都還可以的話,你就能在綠茵場和成年人對抗了。而高中生棒球或者籃球運動員則不能,除了詹姆斯。
[–]Warriorsabothanspy 30 指標 11小時前*
Only the best NBA players can be competitive as teenagers against veteran pros, examples include Kobe, LeBron, KG etc, the same goes for soccer where only the best players are competitive against pros as teenagers, examples include Messi, Ronaldo, Pulisic etc. It』s not nearly as different as you make it out to be.
只有最好的NBA球員能在青少年時對抗經驗豐富的專業運動員。像是科比,詹姆斯,加內特等等。而足球方面,則是像梅西,C羅,普利西奇等等這樣的天才。其實兩個領域之間的差別沒有你說的那麼大。
[–]Wolves BandwagonGet_that_yarn_KAT 37 指標 11小時前
I disagree. 2 years ago, in 2015 there was at least 10 players in the Premier league who were 16 years of age.
You could never have 10 or more 16 year olds in the NBA, or NFL, or NHL. These leagues are just too physical. Bron was a physical specimen and even he would may have had a tough time in the NBA at 16 years old.
I personally think it is definitely easier for young soccer players to play against grown men then it is for basketball players or football players or hockey players.
我不同意。2年前,也就是2015年,英超有至少10名16歲的球員。
而在NBA,或者NFL和NHL,則永遠不會有10名或者更多16歲的運動員。這些聯賽的身體對抗太強了。詹姆斯有副殘暴的筋骨,哪怕是他,16歲就進NBA的話也會被蹂躪的很慘的。
我私以為相比起籃球、橄欖球或者冰球運動員,青年足球運動員對抗成年足球運動員確實更容易點。
[–]NBApetepostlethwaite 5 指標 12小時前
what is a football youth academy? or a youth football academy? not familiar
啥是足球青訓營啊?還是叫青年足球學校什麼的?不是太了解啊。
[–]Cavaliersbenelchuncho 28 指標 12小時前*
You recruit kids from a very young age and train them yourself instead of depending on a draft. This means small market teams can orient themselves on their academy to win. Southampton, for example, recruited Gareth Bale, one of the best players in the world. They』ve also made huge amounts of money selling their players
你在孩子還在很小的年紀便把他們招募進來,自己訓練他們而不是依靠選秀來補充新人。這意味著小球市球隊可以以他們的訓練營為導向來贏球。比如說南安普頓,曾招募加雷斯-貝爾,如今世界上最好的球員之一。他們也通過兜售他們的球員贏得了巨額資金。
[–]76ersdnzgn 22 指標 11小時前
Yeah, European football leagues are really an example of leagues where small market teams can win just as much as Chelsea, Real Madrid and Bayern Munich.
是的。歐洲的足球聯賽真的是一個很好的例子,小球市球隊也能贏下像切爾西,皇馬和拜仁這種豪門一樣多的比賽。
[–]TarHeelTerror 195 指標 16小時前
You must have missed the part about staying under the salary cap
哥們,話別說得太死,就算這種改革真的實現了,小球市球隊也不會慘到哪裡去的。有工資帽的限制呢。
[–]RaptorsSmurfBearPig 502 指標 15小時前
"I m gonna take a pay cut and go play with Shaq and Kobe" - Lebron James 2003
「我打算降薪,與鯊科並肩作戰。」-勒布朗-詹姆斯,2003年。
[–]RaptorsFourCylinder 159 指標 15小時前
You think these dudes coming into the league poor as fuck are gonna take paycuts? I think they d go where ever the most money is right away.
你覺得這些進聯盟時窮的叮咣響的傢伙們會降薪?我覺得他們一切都會向錢看。
[–]Lakersclaydavisismyhero 657 指標 15小時前
Nike " here s 100 million if you go to the big market"
耐克:「如果你去大球市的話,這1億美元就是你的了。」
[–][LAL] Mark Madsenoohwakamuu 123 指標 15小時前
Spot on.
精闢。
[–]Celticsblackblots-rorschach 24 指標 9小時前
Mark Cuban suggested a proposal that combines elements of the draft with free agency. Draft order determines how much cap space teams have to sign rookies to contracts. So the first overall pick can offer a rookie $5M a year over 4 years, second overall can offer them $4.75M, and on and on. Worse teams can pitch more money and playing time, but better teams can pitch culture and development. Some rookies just want playing time to develop.
This proposal wouldn t kill small market teams. San Antonio is a small market and they d have a lot of good rookies want to play for them. Agents are going to push players towards the best situations to develop them, whether that be with more playing time on a bad team or more coaching. If one good team gets a lot of great rookies, the salary cap will mean that they can t all be re-signed. The Warriors situation was special because of the spiking cap. This could also result in the most insane, exciting rookie free agency every year!
馬克-庫班提過一種設想,把選秀和自由球員兩種元素組合起來。選秀順位決定了球隊簽約新秀時有多大空間開合同。第一順位可以給新秀提供每年5百萬美元超過4年的合同,第二順位是每年四百七十五萬,以此類推。成績較差的球隊可以提供更多的工資和出場時間,但是更優秀的球隊可以提供良好的球隊文化與發展機會。有的新秀只是希望有出場時間來提高。
這個設想不會讓小球市球隊滅亡。聖安東尼奧馬刺隊就是個小球市球隊,而會有很多優秀的新秀願意為他們打球。而各種動因會促使球員選擇最好的環境來提高他們,要麼是在一支爛隊中獲得更多出場時間,要麼是在執教更好的球隊。如果一支好球隊得到很多優秀的新秀,工資帽會限制他們無法和母隊續約。勇士的情況因為工資帽的大幅提高而很特殊。這也會導致每年新秀的自由市場會好戲不斷,最為刺激!
[–]CavalierscarbonNanoNoob 315 指標 16小時前
I think honestly you might have to keep them out of the league longer. Otherwise players like Draymond Green would have been playing for peanuts, you ll wreck your franchise throwing money at players like Anthony Bennett. The issue is it s a noisy inequality amplifier. Draft steals become game changers, busts become atom bombs.
坦白髮說,我認為應該讓新秀不要太早進入聯盟(多有一些時間來檢驗成色)。否則球員們,比如德雷蒙德-格林,只能拿著小合同打球,你也會浪費你的選秀權,提供合同給像安東尼-本內特這樣的球員。問題在於,旱的旱死,澇的澇死。選秀大會勝負手,幾家歡喜幾家愁。
[–]WizardsRJSSUFER 88 指標 15小時前
Missing on a number one by taking Anthony Bennett would wreck most franchises. Luckily, the Cavs happen to be near where LeBron James grew up
浪費第一順位在安東尼-本內特身上是最大的浪費。幸運的是,騎士所處的城市恰巧離勒布朗-詹姆斯的長大成人的地方很近。
[–]FinestMilkSteak 22 指標 8小時前
Also helped to win the lottery 3 out of 4 years. Funny that the one year they didn t was when Anthony Davis went 1st. Just imagine if they landed Davis instead of Bennett.
騎士幸運的不只有這一件事啊,四年抽中三個狀元簽的幫助也是大大的。搞笑的是安東尼-戴維斯拿狀元那年他們沒有選秀權。要是騎士那年選中的不是本內特而是濃眉該有多爆炸。
[–]CavaliersLeBronzong 221 指標 16小時前
Lakers, Celtics, Bulls, Heat, Knicks would get nearly all the top free agent rookies
湖人,凱爾特人,公牛,熱火,還有尼克斯,會拿下幾乎所有頂尖的自由球員新秀的。
[–]SpursTheHerdAlert83 145 指標 16小時前
The salary cap exists
Fultz, Lonzo, Simmons, Ingram, Wiggins, Parker, Embiid, Jackson, Taytum all would have commanded 15-20 million from rebuilding teams
別當工資帽不存在呀。
富爾茨,郎佐-鮑爾,本-西蒙斯,英格拉姆,維金斯,賈巴里-帕克,恩比德,約什-傑克遜,還有塔圖姆,對重建球隊都是1500-2000萬美元的身價啊。
[–]Trail BlazersEtzutrap 67 指標 13小時前
Yeah but any time the lakers etc. had cap space they would always be the favorites to aquire a rookie. And any time a lebron/MJ level prospect came along they would probably just trade away contracts until they had enough cap space to grab them. Would basically mean that for all their cap space, a team like the Bucks would never get the change to snag a top tier talent.
是這樣沒錯。不過在任何時候,像湖人等球隊,要是有薪資空間的話,它們永遠是新秀們偏愛的選擇。而無論何時,如果有一名詹姆斯或者喬丹級別的新秀出現的話,他們可能會通過交易清理空間直到球隊能拿下他們。基本上就是說,一支球隊,比如說雄鹿吧,永遠沒有機會得到一名天賦頂級的球員。
[–][NYK] Mirsad Turkcanlevofb1907[S] 71 指標 16小時前
Well I think this can be maneuvered around. For example, only two rookie signing rights per team. Make those trade-able like picks. Allow only one max rookie contract and make sure the signing team has cap space. So teams with the best players wouldn』t be able to go over the cap.
Obviously there would be tuning necessary, but I think there are realistic solutions if the effort is put in.
我認為這是可以避免的。比如說,每支球隊只有兩名新秀的簽約權。它可以像選秀權一樣被交易。每一年只有一名新秀可以拿新秀的頂薪,並確保簽約的球隊有薪金空間。所以擁有最出色球員們的球隊是沒機會超過工資帽的。顯然,這其中還有些細節需要調整,不過我認為只要努力還是有可行的解決方法的。
[–]PistonsadreinD9 120 指標 16小時前
A lot of people may say this is bad for small markets but not every Rookie will want to play in a big market. Better chance of being the face or star of a team that s in a smaller market.
很多人可能會說這對小球市球隊不是什麼好事,但是不是每個新秀都想在大球市中打球啊。相較而言,在小球市球隊中他們更有機會成為門面或者明星的。
[–]SpursTheHerdAlert83 138 指標 16小時前
Yeah people are crazy if they think these 19 year old projected all stars with sky high confidence are gonna take less money to be a 3rd or 4th option on a team
要是有人覺得這些充滿了自信的19歲准全明星們會拿著較少的錢,在球隊中擔當第三或者第四選擇的話,那是真的該吃藥了。
[–][MIN] Brian CardinalJmgill12 163 指標 15小時前
Have you ever met a 4 or 5 star 18 year old?
They don t think they re gonna be a 3rd or 4th option on any team, except for the Warriors. Every single one of them thinks they re gonna be a top 10 player.
Every. Single. One.
This would be a disaster.
你們見過一個18歲大的頂級潛力球星么?
他們可不會認為自己在任何球隊只會擔當第三或第四選擇,除了在勇士吧。他們中的每個人都覺得自己會成為聯盟前十的球員。
每,個,人。
這會是場災難的。
[–]JustSawItLiveSry 37 指標 15小時前
People are crazy if they think these 19 year old projected all stars with sky high confidence are going to play basketball in Memphis
是啊,要是有人覺得這些充滿了自信的19歲准全明星們會來孟菲斯打球的話,那才真的該吃藥了。


※到處秀恩愛!詹姆斯突闖韋德採訪吐槽其化妝
※杜庫訓練三分百發百中,76人拋投上籃都打鐵,人比人得死!
※新的樂透抽籤改革可能會讓季後賽邊緣球隊拿到狀元簽,是利是弊?
※NBA球探解密:馬刺探子遍布全球,林書豪飽受歧視
※威少續約雷霆,每場出場費為50萬美元!雷蜜歡天喜地過大年!
TAG:美國JRs之聲 |