庫里、倫納德、杜蘭特2K評價是94、95、96，詹姆斯應該是多少？

庫里、倫納德、杜蘭特2K評價是94、95、96，詹姆斯應該是多少？

Kawhi Leonard receives a 95 rating in 2k18. Thoughts? Curry 94, Durant 96, LeBron (?) (instagram.com)

科懷-倫納德在2K18中的能力值為95。大家對此有什麼想法嗎？庫里94，杜蘭特96，詹姆斯會是多少呢？

[–][MIA] Daequan Cookdwade420 458 指標 10小時前

Watch them make him a 98 to see the world go crazy and get people talking about the game

看著吧，遊戲的製作者們會把詹姆斯的能力值設定為98，以此來看看全世界陷入瘋狂的樣子，然後讓人們一直討論這個遊戲。

[–]Warriorscantkeepdickinpants 689 指標 10小時前

if they wanted to see the world go crazy theyd make lebron a 96 and kd a 97

如果他們想要看到這個世界陷入瘋狂的話，他們就會把詹姆斯設為96，然後杜蘭特設為97.

[–]rzpieces 414 指標 9小時前

But that"d be "lose customers" crazy

那樣會讓他們陷入「失去顧客」的瘋狂。

[–]KingsKnox_ious 278 指標 9小時前

Are there really 2k fans so into the game that they"re following pre-season rating announcements, but are also fickle enough to not buy the game based on a 1 point difference between players?

是否真的有2K 粉絲如此著迷於這個遊戲，以至於他們正在認真追尋賽季前的評分公告，但是又因為球員間1分的差距而善變到不買這個遊戲了？

[–]BullsGyshall669 33 指標 9小時前

What is he typically? I thought he was like a 95 back in 2k12..

他（詹姆斯）的能力值通常是多少？我記得他2K12那會兒是95的數值。

[–][TOR] DeMar DeRozanFrostyTheKnight10 71 指標 8小時前

He"s been 96-97 for the past 4-5 years

詹姆斯在過去4-5年里的能力值一直都是96-97。

[–]NBATallyHoPKA 125 指標 8小時前

He was a 99 in 2k14

他當年在2K14里的能力值可是99。

[–]Celtics BandwagonKniGht1st 20 指標 7小時前

He just had one of the best seasons ever, and averaged triple double in finals. I wouldn"t be too surprised if he got 98.

詹姆斯剛剛度過了職業生涯最棒的賽季之一，並在總決賽中場均三雙。如果他得到98的評分，我也不會太驚訝。

[–][TOR] DeMar DeRozanFrostyTheKnight10 406 指標 11小時前*

Ronnie said two 95s and two 96+. I"m guessing:

LeBron 96+

KD 96

Kawhi 95

Westbrook 95

Curry 94

Harden 94

AD 93

羅尼曾經說有兩個95分和兩個96或更高的分數。我猜一下：

勒布朗：96+

杜蘭特：96

倫納德：95

威斯布魯克：95

庫里：94

哈登：94

安東尼-戴維斯：93

【注】：羅尼為2K能力值的推特發布者。

[–]WarriorsIonkkll 396 指標 11小時前

I can accept Kawhi even though I disagree but making Westbrook higher is straight retarded.

我可以接受對倫納德能力值的設定，儘管我不是很同意。但是把威斯布魯克的數值設的比庫里還高就沒有什麼腦子了。

[–]Warriorsjjaedong 50 指標 8小時前

yeah they always make westbrook a lock down defender when in actuality Curry is probably a better defender than westbrook just because Russ gives way less effort and curry is actually a really intelligent help defender.

是啊，他們在遊戲里總把威斯布魯克設定為一名單防悍將，但相比於他，庫里在現實中可能是一名更好的防守者，原因就是威斯布魯克在整體防守方面並不夠努力，而庫里實際上是一名非常聰明的協防者。

[–]Thunder Bandwagonlegendariusss 59 指標 8小時前

It"s because in 2k, player IQ doesn"t really matter because all down to the controller. I mean, they have an IQ stat and that just increases/decreases turnovers and fouls pretty much. But because Westbrook actually has better tools than curry to be a defender, in the game the player can make him a better defender

那是因為在2K里，球員的籃球智商真的不重要，因為他們所有的動作都要服從於控制者。我的意思是，球員們有一個球商統計，那會很大程度上增加/減少失誤和犯規。但事實上因為威少在防守上比庫里有更好的身體條件，在遊戲里玩家可以使他成為一名更好的防守者。

[–]Magicthevadster 11 指標 3小時前

This is precisely why insanely athletic guys who can shoot have always been way op in the 2k games. Guys like Lavine, Gerald green, etc.

這恰恰就是為什麼那些既能投籃又有驚人運動能力的球員們在2K里總是更牛逼。比如拉文，傑拉德-格林等等。

[–]Grizzliesthelasthendrix 4 指標 1小時前

2K13 Rudy Gay. His launch point for dunks is so goddamn far, and his threes are wet.

2K13里的魯迪-蓋伊就是那樣。他扣籃的起跳點簡直太特么遠了，而且他的三分雨停不下來。

[–]Clippers Bandwagonf370finance 15 指標 6小時前

The way ratings in 2K work, Curry can be better and still have a lower rating. His limitless range HOF badge is a huge boost that isn"t reflected in the ratings but is very impactful in gameplay

2K評價機制的工作方式（有問題），會出現庫里本身更出色，但仍然評分較低的結果。他無限射程的名人堂徽章本應該在評分上是一個巨大的提升，只是並沒有在分數上反映出來，但在遊戲里還是非常有效的。

[–][HOU] Bobby Brownscrewt 138 指標 11小時前

No big deal really. If people don"t like the rating 2K gives, just change it yourself to what you think it should be.

並不是什麼大問題。如果人們不喜歡2K給的球員能力值，那就去自己改成你認為他們本應該得到的分數吧。

[–]76ersMizterJawsh 51 指標 5小時前

HEY! YOU! Quit being reasonable!

嘿！哥們！不要這麼理智好吧！

[–]Warriorshoffmanmclaunsky 4 指標 2小時前

I always change KDs height to 6"11. Crazy that a "realistic simulation of the NBA".

我總是把杜蘭特的身高設成2.11米，把2K變成「現實的NBA模擬」真是太瘋狂了。

【注】：由於杜蘭特虛報身高，導致其在遊戲中的身高比現實中略低。

[–]SpursCheesyMightyMo 44 指標 9小時前

Overall is a terrible indicator of how good a player actually is in 2k. There"s players with like a 70 overall that play much better than 80s-90s just because of their shot.

總的來說，2K中球員的綜合數值不能用來判斷球員好不好使。70數值的球員僅僅因為投籃准就會用起來比80-90數值的人還要好使。

[–]MagicColdtakes 14 指標 4小時前

Terrance Ross has the best shot in the game

特倫斯-羅斯在遊戲中投籃是最準的。

【注】：其2K能力值僅為75。

[–]WarriorsVerianas 13 指標 7小時前

So true. I actually think Curry misses a lot of open 3"s in 2K. Then guys like Rudy Gay shoot the lights out every game. play with RealPlayer% but still.

太對了。實際上我認為庫里在2K里投丟了大量的空位三分，然後像魯迪-蓋伊這樣的傢伙們每場比賽都無論怎麼投怎麼有。在遊戲里開啟了投籃無視搖桿的選項後仍然是那樣。

【注】：2K中投籃無視搖桿選項打開後，無論投籃時按多長時間，均按照該球員的真實命中率投籃，即個人操作不再對投籃命中率產生影響。

[–][NYK] Kristaps PorzingisYungDankJesus69 15 指標 6小時前

ratings aside cause who really cares but do people really think Kawhi is better than Curry？

拋開評分，誰真的在乎那個呢？但是人們真的認為倫納德比庫里更好嗎？

[–][HOU] Charles BarkleyJimHarden 276 指標 11小時前

I"d have Curry higher or equal to Kawhi

我會把庫里的能力值設得比倫納德更高或相同。

[–]Nets BandwagonLanaRhoades- 352 指標 11小時前

i think because Kawhi"s elite defense his rating gets boosted, Curry is way better on offense in 2k

我認為是倫納德精英級別的防守使他的評分提高了，而庫里在2K里進攻則更為犀利。

[–]CelticsIfuckinglovebball 197 指標 11小時前

Curry is pretty much the hands-down best offensive player in 2k

庫里無疑是2K里最好的進攻球員。

[–]Charlotte HornetsThugginOnUDuckz 83 指標 11小時前

James Harden always gives me trouble in 2k more than Curry.

然而在2K里，詹姆斯-哈登總是能比庫里給我帶來更多的麻煩。

[–]CaucasianAsian8 134 指標 11小時前*

Gap between Curry and Kawhi on offense is smaller than the gap between Kawhi and Curry on defense, especially if you"re just rating them on individual skills then aggregating it .

倫納德在防守端領先庫里的幅度要比庫里在進攻端領先他的幅度大很多，尤其是當你把個人技巧單個評分後累計起來做綜評的時候。

EDIT: Case in point, teams intentionally try to force switches in the playoffs to make Curry guard the ball, whereas it"s the opposite with Kawhi - they want him as far away from the play as possible. That"s not a knock on Curry, Kawhi is just one of the best defensive players we"ve seen and he happens to be a prolific and efficient offensive player too.

編輯：舉個例子，在季後賽中的球隊會刻意試圖通過強制轉換來使庫里去防守持球者，對倫納德就恰恰相反——他們想讓倫納德儘可能地遠離持球者。這不是在打擊庫里，倫納德只是我們所見過的最好的防守者之一，同時他恰好也是一個高產高效的進攻球員。

[–]SpursSalty_Homer 2 指標 7小時前

Kawhi"s rating should be the only one written in binary.

倫納德的評分應該是僅有的一個採用二進位寫出來的。

喜歡這篇文章嗎？立刻分享出去讓更多人知道吧！