讓夢想更近一些

每天10分鐘，攻克一個長難句，

四六級考研複習中的困惑

【昨日回顧】

Historians, especially those so blinded by their research interests that they have been accused of 「tunnel method,」 frequently fall victim to the 「technical fallacy.」

史學家，尤其是那些單純局限於他們研究興趣的史學家，被指責為使用「單方向研究法」，他們常常成為「純技術方法論」的犧牲品。

【今日長難句】

Also common in the natural sciences, the technical fallacy mistakenly identifies the discipline as a whole with certain parts of its technical implementation.

【結構解析】

1. also common in the natural sciences, 為形容詞短語充當狀語成分修飾整個句子。

2. 句子主幹為主謂賓賓補結構，即：the technical fallacy /mistakenly identifies/ the discipline as a whole /with certain parts of its technical implementation; 其中難點在於固定搭配 identify sth. with sth. 譯為：認為某事物等同於.

【詞的處理】

fallacy / ?f?l?si / n. 錯誤，謬論

discipline / ?dis?plin / n. 學科

as a whole 作為一個整體

certain / ?s?:tn/ adj. 某個，某人，某事

implementation / impliment tei?(?)n / n. 實施，履行

【參考譯文】

Also common in the natural sciences, the technical fallacy mistakenly identifies the discipline as a whole with certain parts of its technical implementation.

「純技術方法論」錯誤地把整個學科與學科研究的某些操作方法等同起來，這種情況在自然科學領域裡也屢見不鮮。

【明日長難句】

It applies equally to traditional historians who view history as only the external and internal criticism of sources, and to social science historians who equate their activity with specific techniques.

喜歡這篇文章嗎？立刻分享出去讓更多人知道吧！