美球迷熱議聯盟最好的4名球員還在打季後賽，你同意嗎？

美國JRS之聲

美球迷熱議聯盟最好的4名球員還在打季後賽，你同意嗎？

Would you agree that the 4 best players in the league currently are all still in the playoffs? (self.nba)

大家都同意目前聯盟里最好的4名球員仍然在季後賽中嗎？

No order: LeBron, KD, Kawhi and Steph

I feel like WB and Harden were in the discussion but I don"t think they"re consensus, not nearly as consensus as the other 4 I listed atleast

排名不分前後：勒布朗，杜蘭特，倫納德和庫里。

我認為雖然威少和哈登在討論的範圍之內，但是他們並不是大家公認的，最起碼公認程度沒有上面列出來的4名球員這麼高。

[–]CavaliersMegatron_McLargeHuge 67 指標 15小時前

Is Kawhi still in the playoffs?

倫納德還在季後賽里嗎？

[–]HawksMaczuna 50 指標 14小時前

oh shit too soon

見鬼，發生得太快了。

[–]Warriorsbball2 94 指標 16小時前

Westbrook and harden had better seasons but I think you are right on your list of top 4 players.

威少和哈登這賽季的表現更出色，但是我認為樓主列出的前四的名單是正確的。

[–]Lakerschad12341296 83 指標 16小時前

tbh Harden/Westbrook have inflated stats while KD/Lebron/Curry/Lebron stats represent them or don"t do them justice.

實話實說哈登/威少的數據有些通脹，同時杜蘭特/勒布朗/庫里/勒布朗的數據要麼準確的表現了他們的價值，要麼則沒有足夠體現出他們的價值。

[–][UTA] Gordon HaywardMrgreenfield 69 指標 16小時前

Lebron so good you put him twice. But I completely agree. You cant quantify steph or lebron with regular season stats. They"re literally transcendent players.

是不是勒布朗太偉大了所以你才提到了他兩次，但是我完全贊同，你不能用常規賽的數據去衡量庫里或是勒布朗，因為他倆是最出類拔萃的球員。

[–]packersSBLIIchamps 29 指標 16小時前

Westbrook especially, if this sub is to be believed he literally has trash bins for teammates so obviously he"ll have to do more which inflates his numbers

尤其是威少的數據，但是如果威少的隊友真的像shh說的那樣垃圾的話，那麼顯然他就得做更多的事情，從而 讓自己的數據顯得膨脹。

[–]BullsKredditH 3 指標 14小時前

Westbrook"s teammates aren"t trash. They"re bad at offense but quite good at defense, but people only factor in offensive teammates in the MVP discussion for some reason.

Harden"s teammates are pretty trash at defense for example but since they are solid offensively we pretend they"re good teammates. Honestly both Harden and Westbrook both have perfectly mediocre teammates

威少的隊友並沒有那麼垃圾，他們在進攻端很糟糕，但是很擅長防守，但是不知道為什麼人們在MVP的討論中只看重那些進攻出色的隊友。

比如，哈登的隊友在防守端都很垃圾，但是因為他們的進攻都很強，所以我們就認為他們好像是很強的隊友一樣，講道理哈登和威少的隊友都真的只是一般般罷了。

[–]LakersKingWilliams95 12 指標 16小時前

Lebron would make the other players better, Westbrook made them worse

勒布朗會讓隊友變得更好，威少則讓他們變得更差。

[–]Cavaliers Bandwagonrussellp1212 21 指標 16小時前

maybe WB didn"t make them as good as LeBron could"ve, but he for sure the hell didn"t make them worse lol cmon now

也許威少無法像勒布朗那樣讓隊友變得更加出色，但是他絕對不可能讓他們變得更糟，哈哈哈別逗了兄弟。

[–]Nets BandwagonChitalian8 12 指標 16小時前

I"d argue Harden"s stats aren"t that inflated. Perhaps his rebounds a little bit, but he"s definitely a capable rebounder.

我會爭辯說哈登的數據並沒有那麼膨脹，也許他的籃板有一些，但是他絕對是一個有能力的籃板手。

[–]Cavaliers BandwagonBeastage 7 指標 15小時前

He"s had monster statlines the last 2 seasons before D"Antoni as well though

在德安東尼到來之前的2個賽季里，哈登的數據就已經很嚇人了。

[–]Rocketskarjacker 14 指標 15小時前

Harden has never not been efficient in his career dude

大兄弟，哈登整個生涯中從來就沒有不高效過。

[–]Knicksbringitbruh 3 指標 12小時前

because of that one game...this gonna be a long off season for you harden supporters bro

但是就因為這一場比賽...這個休賽期對於你們登蜜來說可非常漫長了。

[–]NBADob-is-Hella-Rad 9 指標 16小時前

I"d consider Harden/Kawhi more or less a tie, but there"s definitely a case.

我會覺得哈登/倫納德非常接近，但是樓主說的絕對有道理。

[–]Durden1025 16 指標 17小時前

Lebron and curry top 2 .. Durant and kawhi 3 or 4

勒布朗和庫里分別第一和第二...杜蘭特倫納德第三或者第四。

[–]rockandchalkin 22 指標 16小時前

I think you could make a case for KD being 2 and steph 3

我覺得你能夠提出一些杜蘭特第二，庫里第三的理由來。

[–][CLE] Kyrie IrvingRandomFlightlessBird 28 指標 16小時前

Tbh I think after what we"ve seen from Kawhi 2-4 can be pretty interchangeable

講道理，在我們看了最近倫納德的表現後，第二和第四的位置真的可以互換一下了。

[–]rockandchalkin 1 指標 16小時前

I agree. If he can keep it up. I think he hustles harder than anyone on the top 4 list as well.

我也同意，只要倫納德能夠保持下去的話，另外我也覺得他是這份前4的榜單中打球最努力的人。

[–]CelticsMikeOB2 4 指標 15小時前

meh, i still think KD is the 2nd best in the game, Curry and Kawhi are interchangeable

不太好吧，我還是覺得杜蘭特是聯盟中第二棒的球員，庫里和倫納德的位置倒是可以換一下。

[–]Lakers BandwagonMyUsername0_0 15 指標 16小時前

KD is better than Curry

杜蘭特比庫里強一些。

[–]Warriorsfitnesshalp45 12 指標 15小時前

I think it"s arguable, I honestly tend to go back and forth. I think KD is the better all around basketball player, and even the better offensive player in a vacuum. If I need an Iso to win the game, I want KD to have the ball, not to mention his contributions on the defensive end.

But I think Curry has an even bigger impact when he"s on the court than Durant, simply based on the amount of attention he draws on the offensive end, I think he"s more impactful than almost any player in the league in that aspect, and to me how else do you measure the metric of "best" player than their overall length team impact?

我覺得這點值得商榷，我實際上覺得他倆互不相讓。我覺得KD在整體上是更好的籃球運動員，甚至在進攻端的表現也是杜蘭特更好。如果我需要一個單打去贏下比賽，我會讓KD去拿球的，更不用提他在防守端的貢獻了。

但是我覺得庫里在場上比杜蘭特的影響力要大一些，僅僅從他在進攻端吸引對手注意力的程度就能看出來，我認為在這一點上他比聯盟中任何其他球員的影響力都要大，對於我來說，除了對球隊的整體影響外，難道你還有什麼其他的指標去衡量「最好」的球員嗎？

我們的公眾號：ChinaReddit，還處於成長之中~，微博：虎撲JRS字幕~

希望得到您更多的改善建議和支持！

喜歡這篇文章嗎？立刻分享出去讓更多人知道吧！